The conflicting views of rorty and stout on religion in the public sphere

His religious turn became an open possibility as far back as the s, when he forsook rationalistic analytic philosophy for neopragmatism.

The conflicting views of rorty and stout on religion in the public sphere

The conflicting views of rorty and stout on religion in the public sphere

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: Frisina bio Introduction What role should religion play in public discourse? Not too long ago, Richard Rorty argued, in more than one place, that religion is a "conversation stopper" which polite people refer to only in private conversations.

They ask whether a democratic community is worthy of the name if it effectively forbids by custom or legislation a significant segment of its citizens from acknowledging and drawing upon their own traditions to help justify their moral and political claims?

For this reason, Stout seeks in Democracy and Tradition to forge a middle path between contractarian liberals like Rorty and Rawls who complain about the intrusion of religious ideas into public affairs and religious traditionalists like Stanley Hauerwas6 and Alisdair MacIntyre7 who argue that the sorry state of contemporary public discourse is largely the result of the modern tendency to marginalize voices that draw their moral sensibilities from tradition-based religious and cultural values.

Stout's stated goal was to get both sides in this "culture war" to tone down their rhetoric and acknowledge the extent to which their tendency to speak of one another in apocalyptic terms undermines rather than strengthens our democratic traditions.

I bring Stout's book to the attention of American Journal of Theology and Philosophy readers for two reasons. First, I find a certain resonance between Stout's approach to moral and political discourse and several themes that are central to my understanding of Confucian thought in general and Confucian ritual in particular.

In short, I believe that Confucian insights could be used to lend support to Stout's arguments. Second, as a religious tradition, Confucianism has something at stake in the outcome of Stout's argument. Rorty's desire to relegate religious appeals to the realm of private discourse applies to Confucian spirituality as much as fundamentalist Christianity.

If Robert Neville is right to claim that Confucianism has left its original home in East Asia and become a resource for the developing self-understanding of both East Asian and at least some non-East Asian Americans and Europeans,8 then Confucians of all ethnic backgrounds will want to know whether Confucian spiritual insights are to be welcomed and respected within the "public square.

In part one I examine Rorty's shift from a strong secularist assertion that religious justifications have no place in public discourse to a more nuanced understanding that in certain contexts appeals to religion might be compatible with his understanding of democratic discourse.

In part two I turn to Stout whose subtle analysis of the role of authority within democratic traditions provides a broader context which encompasses both democratic and religious discourses.

Along the way, his efforts further redefine what we mean by religion and democracy in ways that extend and are consistent with Rorty's later positions.

Finally, in part three I suggest that the trajectory of this conversation on religion and public life which I trace from Rorty to Stout and others can If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'.

You are not currently authenticated. View freely available titles:Contemporary Political Philosophy and Religion provides an advanced introduction to, and a critical appraisal of, the major schools of political thought with a focus on the relationship between democracy and religion.

Key features of this book include. 2. Eduardo Mendieta and Jonathan Vanantwerpen, The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere (New York: Columbia University Press, ), 1.

KEY WORDS: Dewey, Rorty, pragmatism, irony, democracy, public/private I.

American Journal of Theology & Philosophy

INTRODUCTION It is not always easy to see why some books capture a large and fervent reader- ship among intellectuals while others seem to sink, as Hume said of his own first treatise, stillborn from the press.

Public Administration Essay Examples. 1, total results. A Review of US Public Administration in Afghanistan. 3, words. The Conflicting Views of Rorty and Stout on Religion in the Public Sphere. words. 2 pages. The Tendency of Young Adults to Become Unreliable Voters.

1, words. Rorty Richard () ‘Religion in the Public Square: A Reconsideration’, Journal of Religious Ethics 31 (1): – 9. Crossref Stout Jeffrey () Democracy and Tradition. The Conflicting Views of Rorty and Stout on Religion in the Public Sphere ( words, 4 pages) Rorty and Stout on Religion in the Public Sphere Politics and religion are two of the toughest matters to deliberatewith people of any area.

How Richard Rorty Found Religion by Jason Boffetti | Articles | First Things